13. What Comes Next
Conference Rapporteur: Richard Hundley
As indicated earlier, this conference was merely the beginning of a multi-year
effort to chart the future worldwide course of the information revolution. We
feel that this conference was a good first step, in which we accomplished the
following:
- We developed a shared vision of the information revolution future
towards which the world is being drawn.
- We identified:
- Some recurring concerns regarding this future.
- Some key uncertainties regarding this future.
- Apparent differences in regional emphasis regarding this future.
- Some interesting analytic constructs.
- We laid the groundwork from which to develop models of possible
alternative information-revolution futures in different countries.
- We began assembling an intellectual team to address this problem.
What comes next are some questions for the technologists, a number of topics
requiring further work, and after that, additional conferences. We discuss
each of these briefly in turn.
Questions for the Technologists
The November 1999 conference has posed two categories of questions for the
information technologists:
A. How may technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments[50] over the next 10-20 years add to the characteristics of
"the great IR attractor"? Such developments could include:
- Technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments leading to new
business paradigms -- beyond the current e-commerce paradigm.
- Technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments leading to new
paradigms in education,[51] medicine and
health care, entertainment, or other societal areas.
- Technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments that increasingly
couple cyberspace to physical space.
- Technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments leading to new
computing paradigms (e.g., quantum computing, DNA-based computing, etc.) --
during the next 20 years.[52]
B. How may technology developments over the next 10-20 years facilitate the
access of have-nots to the information revolution, or otherwise cause
differential impacts in various regions of the world? Such developments could
include:
- Developments that avoid (or overcome) requirements for education (e.g.,
the current keyboard-style interface) and/or cultural change in order to
effectively access information technology.
- Developments that reduce the amount of infrastructure (e.g., electric
power grid, telecommunications network, etc.) required to effectively access
information technology.
- Developments that remove (or overcome) language barriers.
- Developments that could enable some nations or regions in the
developing world to skip stages that the developed world has gone through in
the past (e.g., skipping land-lines and going right to a wireless-based
telecommunications network).
These questions will be addressed during a Spring 2000 conference.
Topics Requiring More Work
The November 1999 conference identified a number of topics requiring further
work. These include:
- Models of the information revolution. We need to flesh out the
set of models presented in Section 12 in much more detail, and begin
"assigning" nations to each of the various models.
- The information revolution in Latin America. We need a small
workshop focused on this subject, to broaden and deepen our understanding of
the course of the information revolution in this part of the world.
- The future course of IT penetration. Papers presented at the
November conference presented a quantitative picture of the state of IT
penetration throughout the world today, focusing primarily on the Internet. We
need to expand this picture beyond the Internet, to other aspects of IT
technology, and develop quantitative projections of future IT penetration
throughout the world, insofar as possible.
- "Proximity" in the information age. We need to better
understand which societal activities will cluster geographically, and which
will disperse.
These topics will be worked on during the coming months.
And After That: Additional Conferences
Once the above items are (substantially) complete, we anticipate holding two
more major international conferences, preferably in Europe and in Asia, to
expose and vet our results before a wider international audience, thereby
broadening and deepening our models of the future course of the information
revolution throughout the world.
[50] We are using the terminology "technology,
artifact, and roles/usage" here in the sense described in Section 10.
[51] Particularly entertainment viewed as a
venue through which social, political, and cultural values are transferred from
one nation or society to another.
[52] The 1997 ACM conference (see Denning and
Metcalfe, 1997, and Denning, 1999) identified a number of new computing
paradigms that could come to fruition over the next 50 years. The time horizon
for our current effort is only 20 years. So the question is: which of these
new computing paradigms are likely to come to fruition during this shorter time
period?
Contents
Previous
Chapter
Appendix
A