13. What Comes Next

Conference Rapporteur: Richard Hundley

As indicated earlier, this conference was merely the beginning of a multi-year effort to chart the future worldwide course of the information revolution. We feel that this conference was a good first step, in which we accomplished the following:

What comes next are some questions for the technologists, a number of topics requiring further work, and after that, additional conferences. We discuss each of these briefly in turn.

Questions for the Technologists

The November 1999 conference has posed two categories of questions for the information technologists:

A. How may technology, artifact, and roles/usage developments[50] over the next 10-20 years add to the characteristics of "the great IR attractor"? Such developments could include:

B. How may technology developments over the next 10-20 years facilitate the access of have-nots to the information revolution, or otherwise cause differential impacts in various regions of the world? Such developments could include:

These questions will be addressed during a Spring 2000 conference.

Topics Requiring More Work

The November 1999 conference identified a number of topics requiring further work. These include:

These topics will be worked on during the coming months.

And After That: Additional Conferences

Once the above items are (substantially) complete, we anticipate holding two more major international conferences, preferably in Europe and in Asia, to expose and vet our results before a wider international audience, thereby broadening and deepening our models of the future course of the information revolution throughout the world.


[50] We are using the terminology "technology, artifact, and roles/usage" here in the sense described in Section 10.

[51] Particularly entertainment viewed as a venue through which social, political, and cultural values are transferred from one nation or society to another.

[52] The 1997 ACM conference (see Denning and Metcalfe, 1997, and Denning, 1999) identified a number of new computing paradigms that could come to fruition over the next 50 years. The time horizon for our current effort is only 20 years. So the question is: which of these new computing paradigms are likely to come to fruition during this shorter time period?


Contents
Previous Chapter
Appendix A